On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:43 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Jon Seltzer <seltzer1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I know what assoc does:
>> >
>> > user=> (assoc [\a \b \c] 0 \d)  ;please extend to much larger vector
>> > with index somewhere in the middle
>> > [\d \b \c]
>> >
>> > but what if I want:
>> >
>> > user=> (assoc-x [\a \b \c] 0 \d)  ;is there an assoc-x
>> > [\a \d \b \c]
>> >
>> > I don't see a function that does this.  I'm sure I'm missing it.  I,
>> > of course, know this could be done with a combination of other
>> > functions like subvec and/or into but it seems fundamental enough to
>> > have its function.
>>
>> The internal structure of vectors is such that this cannot be
>> done efficiently, which is why no function to do it is included
>> in clojure.core.  You can do it inefficiently like this:
>>
>>    (let [v '[a b c d e f]
>>          i 3]
>>      (into (subvec v 0 i) (cons 'X (subvec v i))))
>>    ;=> [a b c X d e f]
>>
>> That's about as good as you're going to get with vectors, O(n)
>> where n is (- (count v) i).
>>
>> --Chouser
>> http://joyofclojure.com/
>
> How is the performance of your FingerTrees looking? ;)
> David

I'm actually working on it again, now that the book is requiring less
time.  When it's ready, I won't be shy about announcing it. :-)

--Chouser
http://joyofclojure.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to