And it's usage is far less generalised than macros in LISP. It is not an usual solution to write acamlp4 preprocessor.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 23 Aug., 14:03, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If the AST of LISP were more complicated, this kind of program would >> be more complicated. > > eg. see OCaml's camlp4. I found it complicated compared to Lisp style > macros. > > Sincerely > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
