That was it. I didn't think that calling the method directly on the
record would use reflection.

(dotimes [_ 10] (time (dotimes [_ 10000] (m1 my-simple-P "hello"))))

"Elapsed time: 14.765 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 5.347 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 21.427 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 7.267 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 2.88 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 2.675 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 6.643 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 2.548 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 2.773 msecs"
"Elapsed time: 2.833 msecs"

So from this it seems that using extend might be somewhat slower, but
not that much, and it is much more convenient for code reuse (the
numbers I am getting are not very reliable since there are other
processes going on in this desktop computer).

Thanks for your help,

Toni.

On Aug 21, 2:07 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 21.08.2010 um 07:33 schrieb Toni Batchelli:
>
> > (dotimes [_ 10] (time (dotimes [_ 10000] (.m1 my-simple-P "hello")))) ;
>
> > "Elapsed time: 131.973 msecs"
>
> I think you get caught by reflection here. As Nicholas said, you should call 
> m1, not .m1.
>
> Sincerely
> Meikel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to