Damon reply to me and not the list, so I forward.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Damon Snyder <drsny...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> Thanks for the suggestions. Regarding the first one: ah, I see. That
> is a nice compact way to test to see if the str is nil. I added that
I reckon that Meikel's suggestion of using when is surely better in
this situation (for a and).
But the (or something? default) or (or known? recompute?) can be useful.
> in because I was getting null pointer exceptions when the string was
> null. What is the difference between {:count 1 :words (list words)}
> and a hash-map? I was under the impression that {} created a hash.
>
I just find it easier to read because it looks like a value and not a
function call.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
