I don't see what the concern may be. Can you elaborate? On Aug 18, 10:04 am, Matt Fowles <matt.fow...@gmail.com> wrote: > All~ > > Boolean.valueOf() was added in 1.4. While that seems ancient, some older > libraries use 'new Boolean()' because they maintain 1.2 compatibility. It > seems like Clojure should take more care when it unboxes Booleans... > > Matt > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > I am not an expert. Is it possible on some JDK to put a breakpoint on > > Boolean constructor and look at the stack? > > Or you can't put a breakpoint on standard library? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
