Have you considered taking a function that will produce the collection? (map-queue odd? #(range 1 10) :queue-size 5)
and in your function of course, (doseq [value (coll)] So that there's no intermediary holding on to the head. Making your function a macro would perhaps clean it up a bit so client code can just put a form and you code the more clear form (fn [] ...) This seems to me preferable than depending on the compiler wits since the head rule is pretty clear but being up to date in the latest compiler features (and possible regressions) is more difficult. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en