That's succinct :) I haven't tested it against Meikels version which seems to be based upon take-while.
However I think this functionality would be nice to have in core or contrib, how do one propose it? Thanks for all contributing to this thread. btw bOR_: I was reading the same blogpost :) 2010/8/8 Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> > Yet another version: > > (defn take-while-acc [f pred coll] > (map (fn [_ x] x) > (take-while pred (reductions f coll)) > coll)) > > Seems to work: > > user> (take-while-acc + #(< % 100) (range)) > (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13) > > Note that reductions does use an "accumulator" (in the form of a > closed over local), so the above works as requested. Also, this > version constructs no auxiliary data structures, not even two-element > vectors. > > Sincerely, > Michał > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
