On Aug 7, 2:02 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No. We want to collect more information and do more comparisons before > > moving away from the recommended Java buffering.
Maybe this comparison can be of interest? http://nadeausoftware.com/articles/2008/02/java_tip_how_read_files_quickly Somebody tests 13 different ways to read a 100MB file with Java 1.5, and get timings ranging from half a second to 10 min. jf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
