On 23 July 2010 06:50, George Jahad <cloj...@blackbirdsystems.net> wrote: > i like it a lot! what do you think of adding trampoline to it like > so: > > http://gist.github.com/487019
Thanks! Trampoline in letrec automatically breaks all cases where the value being bound to the local is not a function, so it would interfere with what I'm trying to do. Having said that, it seems to me that it's a very cool idea for a custom letfn variant permitting mutual recursion of unbounded depth. I'll investigate this further. All the best, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
