May be at least this should be documented? I could understand, that some developers will be mixed up by behavior...
On Friday, July 16, 2010, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > This behavior is by design. > > (1) The absence of warning is consistent with proxy, reify, etc. You specify > as much as you want, and there is no warning. This is very unlikely to change! > > (2) The dynamism implied by a hypothetical "append-partial-protocol" seems > high on complexity and low on value. But since it came up, maybe I'm wrong. > Real motivating examples always welcome. > > Stu > >> It's better to illustrate this with simple example: >> >> If I'll define following protocol: >> >> (defprotocol test1 >> (a1 [this] "a1") >> (a2 [this] "a2") >> (a3 [this] "a3") >> ) >> >> and then I can extend it with following constuction: >> >> (extend-protocol test1 String >> (a1 [this] (str "Hello1 " this "!"))) >> >> then I get no warning, that protocol test1 has 3 methods, and if I'll try >> to call corresponding, not defined methods, then I'll get >> >> (a2 "bbb") --> method not defined >> >> and if I'll try to extend it further with following call >> >> (extend-protocol test1 String >> (a2 [this] (str "Hello1 " this "!"))) >> >> then a2 will defined, but a1 become undefined. >> >> May be we'll need either have a warning, that extend-protocol doesn't >> defines all necessary methods, or we'll need to allow to "append" methods, >> not defined earlier.... >> >> >> [AvataR] at "Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:27:36 +0300" wrote: >> [> I have record J:Bot, protocol P:Bot >> [> and two files, one extend-protocol statement by file. >> [> After loading first file i get: >> [> http://pastebin.com/Kq5GZ6RJ >> [> After loading second file i get: >> [> http://pastebin.com/Pu3kHZ1h >> >> [> Looks like next extend-protocol rewrite :impls seg. How/where post the >> [> bug? >> >> [> Or myabe this is a feature? :] >> >> >> >> -- >> With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA >> http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://alexott.net/ >> http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ >> Skype: alex.ott >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
