Kyle I think I understand what you are saying.
So in practice you should prevent functions called from a macro from evaluating the records (using quoting), so that the output is in a form that looks like source code should? So think it probably is my lack of intuition about macros that is the problem here? > What I don't know is, is it meaningful for a macro to expand to > something that contains stuff that couldn't ever appear in the output > of the reader, like instances of user-defined types, or even Java > objects for that matter? What is the expected behavior here? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
