Once you walk down the path of "What should (max) return?" I think you won't want a default behavior.
Stu P.S. Agreed that (max []) is a bad example. > I noticed that http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/clojure.core/max has both > (apply max [1 2 3 4]) -> 4 and (max []) -> [] (which I think is a poor > example). > > However, when attempting to add another example for (apply max []) which I > expected to return nil, that instead it throws an exception. > > I have to admit, I've never come across this in practice, but it seems like > adding the overload would be nice for generality. > > -- Aaron > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
