Whoops. s/Raoul/Peter Schuller/.
On Jul 8, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Greg wrote: > I hope it didn't sound like I was saying threads are *always* bad, as I > definitely don't think that. :-p > > Your link to the epoll + threads document is probably the best way to go > (that I'm aware of), to address any of the issues that Raoul brought up > w.r.t. long operations in between the events themselves, but doesn't Netty do > that already with a thread-pool? > > - Greg > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Raoul Duke wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> wrote: >>> A fundamental understanding of the difference between threads and >>> kqueue/epoll (which power NIO) should clear up anyone's misgivings about >>> evented servers. They are clearly more scalable, it is no contest. >> >> oh Erlang, were art thou? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
