What's the idiomatic way to handle cases where one has a macro rather than a function?
For example: intent is as follows but does not work: (def args [false true false]) (apply or args) alternatives? a> (eval `(or @~args)) b> (reduce #(or %1 %2) args) any recommended? thanks, Pedro On Jul 7, 4:47 pm, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/7/7 Cameron <cpuls...@gmail.com>: > > > Thanks everyone! I certainly have my solution; but, I'm still a bit > > confused. Here's another example... > > > user=> (defmacro foo [coll] `(map identity ~coll)) > > #'user/foo > > user=> (foo (list 1 2 3)) > > (1 2 3) > > > In this example, I pass an explicit list and all I have to do is > > unquote 'coll'. How is passing an explicit list any different than > > having it destructured via '&' in the argument vector? > > You're not passing a list. You're passing the code for creating a list. > Use macroexpand, it's your friend -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
