On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/7/1 Martin DeMello <martindeme...@gmail.com>: >> Anything more efficient than (map str (seq string)) ? > > I cannot think of another hof-like version that may be more efficient. > > If you want to avoid at all cost the creation of intermediate Seq elements: > > (defn explode-string [^String string] > (loop [i (int 0) v (transient [])] > (if (== i (.length string)) > (persistent! v) > (recur (inc i) (conj! v (.substring string i (inc i))))))) > > But do you really need a so much more complex version ?
I haven't benchmarked yet, but it's called frequently enough that it's probably worth making it efficient. (This is in code that converts a dictionary to a trie) martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
