> > Tying the fortunes of Clojure to Java was a brilliant move and one > that I've advocated for years but the trend I've seen lately to try to > paper over the Java underpinnings of the language worries me, as does > talk of making Clojure-in-Clojure. There's a small but viable market > for people doing difficult things in a Java-flavored Lisp (Runa, > Flightcaster, BackType etc), but this is where the future of Clojure > lies - as a power tool for heavy lifting on the Java platform. >
So those who left Java behind years ago but like Lisps in general and Clojure in particular and want to minimize their contact with Java, where do they fit in your view? Enemies of the proper use of Clojure? Destroyers of the future? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
