Hi, 2010/6/30 Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com>: > [...] > Then again, given that CCW has paredit built-in, I'm not going to > claim Emacs is likely to be much better. (I actually find it simpler, > but if the students in question have Java classes ahead of them / in > parallel, they'll likely need an IDE anyway, so...) I wonder how much > hassle it would be to provide Enclojure with an implementation too; > perhaps I'll into this in the future.
I hope this will be possible in the future. I've done everything I could think about to make it possible. paredit.clj is totally decoupled from eclipse, and only depends on clojure and contrib (and in its next version, from another clojure library which only depends on clojure). But I would suggest waiting a little bit more before digging into it, because the new version will be far superior in terms of API and implementation (not in term of features, in this release) to the current one. If everything goes well, I'll eventually publish it to clojars, of course. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
