Silly me. I forgot about (doc …). Thanks for the answers. Well, it's good there is documentation, pity it's all over the place.
Meikel, idiots are nice people too, so don't feel bad. But seriously, why do you think we work this hard to make the computer do all this things for us? Because we're lazy. On Jun 29, 2:17 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Jun 29, 11:55 am, michele <michelemen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Well, to my surprise and frustration, I haven't found any place which > > documents that reduce takes an optional initial value. > > http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/branch-1.1.x/index.html > > In particular: > > http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/branch-1.1.x/clojure.core-api.ht... > > (or alternatively: (doc reduce) at the repl) > > What does this leave open on questions? (Granted: reduce is rather > well documented, there are worse examples.) > > > Please, dear very good Clojure creators, if you don't want Clojure to > > be another language for the specially initiated, good examples will > > take Clojure to the next level. > > Uh. Sky is falling again. But your are right. Nice examples would be a > nice addition. It's the first thing I'm looking for, when learning > something new. I'm not sure they should go to the reference docs, > though. > > > People are just like Clojure, lazy. > > Why do I support lazy people in my spare time? I'm an idiot. > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
