I'd prefer the for-version in this case. You see the differences if you try `for` and `map` with multiple collections. `for` is a traditional list-comprehension (1). `map` iterates over many sequences at once, `for` does "nested" iteration.
(1): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_comprehension#Clojure On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Oleg <oleg.richa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will show example based on hiccup library: > > For version: [:ol (for [x coll] [:li x])] > Map version: [:ol (map (fn [x] [:li x]) coll)] > > What's the difference between them? What is better for performance? > > Cheers, Oleg > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- Moritz Ulrich Programmer, Student, Almost normal Guy http://www.google.com/profiles/ulrich.moritz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
