On 28 June 2010 06:11, Garth Sheldon-Coulson <g...@mit.edu> wrote: > Ah, thanks. I also see no test failures (archlinux).
After realising that the not-AOT-compiled namespaces might still break when require'd, I went ahead and tested a couple of them. There was about a 50/50 split between the working namespaces and the broken namespaces in my (very) small sample. Unfortunately c.c.macro-utils and c.c.pprint are both on the "broken" side, which I guess means no out-of-the-box swanking. :-/ Sincerely, Michał -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
