On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > (defn fact [n] > (loop [n n r 1] > (if (zero? n) > r > (recur (dec n) (* r n)))))
Thanks for posting this surprisingly simple example of something that looks like it should work, but wouldn't under the current proposal. Really demonstrates how even for straightforward programs you would have to do a certain amount of "type flow" analysis to verify that it will compile. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
