Ah -- well that makes sense then. Bravo! Rob
On Jun 17, 2:15 pm, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 17, 5:10 pm, Rob Lachlan <robertlach...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think the enhanced support for primitives is fantastic. I'm looking > > forward to doing more numerical work in clojure. > > > Quibble: Using a multiple-recursive algorithm for calculating > > fibonnaci values. > > > user> (defn fib-2 [n] (if (>= n 1) > > (loop [i 0 f0 0 f1 1] > > (if (== i n) f0 (recur (inc i) > > f1 > > (+ f0 f1)))))) > > Naive fib is often used as a benchmark, the point being not to do a > fast fib, but comparative, 'what is the perf on naive fib'? Not being > tail-recursive, it tests function calling overhead, and thus here > demonstrates what we gain by not having to box on args and returns. > > Rich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
