Sorry I may have missed the reason for this earlier: What's the reason for allowing both 'i' and 'j' to indicate the imaginary part? Is the intention to also later have 'k' to support quaternions? Just curious. Thanks.
Carson On Jun 14, 10:12 am, Travis Hoffman <travis.a.hoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've almost completed a Complex (and Imaginary) basic type in a fork > of clojure. It turns out that it was a bit more effort that I had > originally indicated. I'll save the implementation details for the > clojure-dev group, but here is a quick run-down of the "interface", > such as it is: > > 1.) Added two classes: clojure.lang.Complex & clojure.lang.Imaginary > (These do not extend Number) > 2.) Added and modified the core java code related to the basic > mathematical operations to allow Complex and Imaginary to > s(cr)eamlessly integrate with the existing Number types. You can +, -, > *, / with the existing types. > 3.) Comparison operations are not implemented for Complex & Imaginary. > Note: The exception reported is currently a ClassCastException, which > is the default if you try to compare anything that isn't Comparable. > > user=> (< "foo" "bar") > java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String cannot be cast to > java.lang.Number (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) > user=> (< 3i 4i) > java.lang.ClassCastException: clojure.lang.Imaginary cannot be cast to > java.lang.Number (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0) > > 4.) Added pattern matching for parsing complex numbers in a very > flexible way. You can use any Number type (even ratios!) as the > imaginary and real parts of the Complex and Imaginary numbers. The > formatting of a complex number is natural: > 3+4i, 4/5i, 2.12+2/3i, etc. and you can prepend 'i', 'I', 'j' or 'J' > to indicate the imaginary part. As with properly formatted doubles and > floats, there must be no whitespace between the numbers and the '+' or > '-' sign. The '+' or '-' in the format of a complex is not an infixed > operator! :-) > 5.) Results of the real and imaginary parts follow Clojure conventions > for producing Ratios: > > user=> (/ 6+6i 5) > 6/5+6/5i > user=> (/ 6+6i -5) > -6/5-6/5i > user=> (/ 6+6i 5i) > 6/5 > user=> (/ 6+6i -5i) > -6/5 > > This is mostly working, but is beta. There are a few known bugs: > 1.) Parsing of floats and doubles with sign included in the mantissa > seems to be a bit off. > 2.) 44 tests fail when I run 'ant test' > 3.) I need to create tests for correctness of operations. > > Overall, I would estimate that I'm about 80% done with a error-free > implementation, but the basic behavior of the Complex type works. I've > put somewhere in the neighborhood of 60 hrs into it so far, so it's > been a relatively small effort but I've had to touch some rather > obtuse code. > > I'm a n00b with git (but experienced with cvs and svn); I'm still > trying to figure out how to push my local git repository changes to > the fork I created on github. Can anyone help me there? > > The fork on git-hub is: > > git://github.com/travis-a-hoffman/clojure.git > > I created a branch locally "complex_type", and have done git commit -a > with my changes. I can't, however, seem to push my changes back to > github: > > ~/Projects/HackingClojure/workspace/clojure> git push > fatal: remote error: > You can't push to git://github.com/travis-a-hoffman/clojure.git > Use g...@github.com:travis-a-hoffman/clojure.git > > Using the recommended doesn't help: > > ~/Projects/HackingClojure/workspace/clojure> git push > g...@github.com:travis-a-hoffman/clojure.git > Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly > > Cheers, > > Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
