Thanks for comments.
In fact, I have some other thing to recommend.
I think that there should be some kind of clojure "standard library". I
don't see how to write any code if I have to have 2 different versions
depending on underlying virtual machine, JVM or CLR. There are 3 python
implementations (CPython, IronPython, Jython) which support python standard
libraries at the moment.
For example, I have looked at "REPL on socket" example. I have naively tried
to start it under ClojureCLR. Of course, it ended with exception because
there are references to java.net and java.io.
.NET is standard in company where I work so I have no way to promote clojure
which runs on JVM.
Also, there is additional benefit of such standard library. It isolates your
code from changes in java libraries. I am not java expert so I don't know
rate of change of java libraries at the moment, but I remember that there
are some deprecated libraries in the past. Deprecated features are still
present in .NET environment.
I would like to help on building of such library (libraries), but I don't
feel confident to propose design. I don't know if functional or OO way is
preferred by clojure users.
Also, I see that there is clojure.java.io library. I think clojure.io would
be more appropriate name.
And one comment for the end. I find syntax for map lookup little bit
uncommon. I find get function easier to understand in code. What you think?
Best wishes, Franis.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.paw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 June 2010 23:00, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:25 PM, frantz <franis.sirko...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to know if there is "Clojure Enhacements Proposals" list
> >> ("wish list"). I would like to add something.
> >>
> >> Best wishes, Franis.
> >
> > user> (= mailing-list wish-list)
> > true
> > ;)
>
> Fast becoming my top priority enhancement.
> Read the literature on Clojure and I see one line error reports
> extracted from the Java stack trace.
> Real use shows 101 lines of useless info wrapping one or two lines
> of useful information.
> Offputting, to say the least.
>
>
> regards
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
