On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Oleg <oleg.richa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Currently i'm just calling function, but there is a danger of > StackOverflow. I can't use recur, because it's not last statement. As > i can understand recur is good to build long sequences, but in my case > i'm building hierarchy.
Two potential solutions: 1. Build a lazy hierarchy, i.e. instead of returning a nested structure, return a function that produces it. It might be better to use a built-in function tree-seq though (check the implementation of file-seq and xml-seq). 2. If everything else fails use a trampoline http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/6257cbc4454bcb85/7d5fd827cd549080#7d5fd827cd549080 Cheers, Andrzej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
