> Yes, that answers my question. Cool :)
> Sorry still a newbie to clojure and > lisps in general here. No problem. I didn't mean to imply there was anything wrong with the question as such. It's just that you mentioned specifically overflowing the stack so I thought I might be missing something about the intent. -- / Peter Schuller -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
