On 8 jun, 05:47, Daniel <doubleagen...@gmail.com> wrote: > These notation arguments are compelling. >
I'm not convinced. The notation would only work for literals, and how often would one write literal complex numbers? For non-literals the notation would need to support this: (* (my-complicated-algo x)+(my-other-complicated-algo y)i (another- algo z)i) This is no issue at all without this notation: (complex-times [(my-complicated-algo x) (my-other-complicated-algo y)] [0 (another-algo z)]) Implementing this notation would obviously require a serious overhaul of clojure for a nice-to-have feature. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
