Hi,
Am 03.06.2010 um 16:16 schrieb Laurent PETIT:
> I think I clearly understand the benefits of namespaces in this case. I was
> reacting to Meikel's sentence:
>
> "And redefining things in foreign namespaces is rather not a technique we
> should support..."
I think what I meant was mentioned also by the others: don't extend a protocol
to a type if you don't own either one. Doing so if you don't own one of them,
this is basically equivalent to
(in-ns 'some.other.namespace)
(let [orig-x some-x]
(defn some-x
[foo]
(if (my-foo? foo)
(do-stuff foo)
(orig-x foo))))
At least IMHO.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
