On May 30, 12:32 am, Daniel Borchmann <daniel.borchm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The same happens if i goes up to 100, 1000, ... Is this a bug or is > this a fundamental misconception of mine? You're using them wrong. Transients are not imperative data structures. You need to capture the return value of assoc! and use that as the new transient. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
