Thanks Christophe. That looks relatively clean as well. (As clean as the Java version anyway). And it's the fastest version shown so far. -Patrick
On May 28, 9:57 am, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:09 PM, CuppoJava <patrickli_2...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > d,w are arrays that are passed to me by a machine learning algorithm > > so it's not something that I have control over. There are roughly 100 > > words per doc. > > ok > > > Thanks for everyone's help. I wonder if directly mutable primitives is > > something that is hard to put into Clojure? Or something that's > > explicitly avoided because it distracts from the FP paradigm. The lack > > of them is making this code somewhat awkward to write. > > In this case there is no need for mutable primitives. > You can try a direct translation of your java code: > > (let [n (alength w)] > (loop [doc (int -1) i (int 0)] > (when (< i n) > (let [new-doc (aget d i) > (when-not (= doc new-doc) > (load doc)) > (when-not (malformed doc) > (process new-doc (aget w i)) > (recur new-doc (inc i))))))) > > You can tweeak it here and there (== and unchecked-inc for example) and > don't forget to typehint d and w if Clojure doesn't infer their type. > > Christophe > > -- > Brussels, 23-25/6http://conj-labs.eu/ > Professional:http://cgrand.net/(fr) > On Clojure:http://clj-me.cgrand.net/(en) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
