Your solution is very clear Meikel. I don't have a benchmark. I'm just worried about the overhead of creating seqs. You use two map's and one vector (which each create a seq I think). The array's will be several gigabytes in size so it might build up.
I forgot to mention that documents can only be loaded in one at a time. Loading a new document releases the currently loaded document. So memoize won't quite work. But I can figure out the details myself. Thanks for the help -Patrick On May 27, 3:24 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:07:30PM -0700, CuppoJava wrote: > > Thanks for the help. Is there a nice efficient way of doing it with > > loop and recur? The proposed solutions are quite expensive as written > > as compared to the Java equivalent. > > No, thanks to memoize my solution does what you want. It loads > each document only once. It short-circuits on mal-formed? (in case > it is expensive). And it stops as soon as a mal-formed document is > found (or the document list is exhausted). > > Do you have a benchmark, which shows how expensive the solutions are > compared to the Java version? > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
