Ah wait, I may have read that wrong. So what I understand is because I am calling it from the the -e, it is ran in the user ns. Ok that makes sense.
On May 26, 2:28 am, Brent Millare <brent.mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Meikel, > > Well if #'user/x is the correct behavior, then the repl behavior needs > to be fixed. Either one may be "correct" but that does not explain the > discrepancy. Also I agree that eval should be avoided, but I found an > extreme case where it was necessary (due to the desired side effect of > starting a new classloader). > > Best, > Brent > > On May 26, 1:27 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > On May 26, 12:17 am, Brent Millare <brent.mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > ^^ That should read #'bar/x instead of #'user/x > > > No. foo/f expands into a macro calling eval on a def. This eval > > is put into a function bar/b. When you call the function the > > namespace "in charge" is user. So everything is correct. > > > Usual disclaimer: > > Don't do non-global def (besides a surrounding scope-limiting > > let). Avoid eval. > > > Sincerely > > Meikel > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
