Hi,
On May 21, 9:35 am, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would bet on: meant as examples for demonstrating the possible
> combinations, as well as the recursive nature of the patterns.
Yes. I second that. I hardly ever needed (or saw in other code) more
than {:keys [a b c]} or [a b & c]. In the sequence case maybe with
one recursion level [a [b c]] or so.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
