Hi, I realize that at some level, "str" is just calling toString so the behaviour isn't really defined. I find the following surprising though because "str" doesn't obviously involve "printing":
user=> (binding [*print-length* 1] (str '(1 2 3 4))) "(1 ...)" This is because ASeq.toString delegates to RT.printString, which eventually uses the print-method multimethod which honors *print-length*. Would it make sense for ASeq to unbind *print-length* in its toString method? If so, it might require a new *str-length*. If not, it would be nice for str to document this interaction. -- Aaron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
