far as i know..actors share a mutable queue.. so there's good possibility
for dead-locks

for scala theres an akka framework , that you can solve that with its actors
.. that let me see.. uses a STM..
and its actors are pretty the same as .. clojures agents

i think clojure are making disciples in others languages too :)

but the greatest argument is the lack of composabillity and reuse that
side-effect functions suffer from...

the old divide-n-conquer..

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 9:17 PM, patrickdlogan <patrickdlo...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Nice diatribe against actors by someone who's apparently never...
> actually... used... actors. Clojure is really nice, but that doesn't
> mean I'm going to buy into weak arguments against features it doesn't
> have in its core.
>
>
> On May 16, 12:19 pm, Fabio Kaminski <fabiokamin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry about using the list like twitter..
> >
> > but i thought this is a pretty good "article" about functional
> programming
> > side effects, and why actors are not very good design decision..
> >
> > Actors not good for concurrency model :
> http://pchiusano.blogspot.com/2010/01/actors-are-not-good-concurrency...
> >
> > just another prove that Rich thoughts are pretty concise ,
> > and that all are pretty well materialized in clojure's framework.
> >
> > what convinced me to embrace clojure, is that it choose to make the right
> > thing , instead of the popular one..
> >
> > as haskell community says wisely : "avoid success at all costs " :)
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to