On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Robert Ewald <robew...@gmx.net> wrote: > Am Sonntag, 11. April 2010 00:59:47 schrieb DanL: >> On 11 Apr., 00:34, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <ava...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > As far as I know, there were problems with the protocol using symbols >> > > in CL's package::symbol syntax (and some other characters not being >> > > allowed in Clojure) after changes in CVS Slime about five months ago. >> > >> > So it would just need to use a sexp parser instead of directly >> > interning the foreign symbols? Not that I'm volunteering or anything >> >> A small custom reader would be part of the solution, I guess. > > IIRC there has been some work on slime making a thin RPC layer. I haven't > looked recently how far that one has come. Unfortunatly I am not in the > position to contribute patches, but I think that swank-clojure should consider > adopting this protocol, although I don't think there are any promisies > regarding stability.
Terje Norderhaug implemented it and is already in use in the latest swank-clojure. -- Ramakrishnan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
