On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > While it sounds soo evident now that you say that explicitly ( the > contains? / get pair ), it may be good to reflect that in the docs of > the functions rather than just keep this knowledge here ?
Agreed. This explanation of the relationship between contains? and get should be reflected in the docs. I *finally* understand why contains? returns false for lists, rather than an error. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
