Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
>
> On 29 Apr., 01:38, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1. Don't include seq-contains? The behavior you want can usually be
> > achieved by using (some #{item} coll). Disadvantage - if you're
> > testing to see if the collection contains nil, that won't work.
>
> Not entirely correct. (some #(= % item) coll) works always and is
> basically how seq-contains? is implemented. However there are
> opinions that some is not obvious enough.
>
(some {item true} coll) works with nil too, but usally all the love goes to
#(= % item, it's unfair! :-)
Christophe
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
