On Apr 27, 2010, at 3:20 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote:

Watching Stuart's tutorial, it looks like the automatic factory
functions for deftypes have gone away (I'm still working with Clojure
1.1, so haven't had a chance to try the latest changes for myself).
I'm going to miss that feature, especially for defrecord, which is now
the "common case" construct.

I understand that you can always do "Foo." to construct a Foo record,
but these constructors don't act as full-fledged functions, right?

Honestly, for me the main issue is just that subjectively, it is less
satisfying to create a Clojure data structure and end up with
something that you construct with Java interop syntax.  I'd like
Clojure data structures to look and feel "Clojurish" not "Javaish"
(yes, I know that Clojure is built with interop in mind, so
technically, anything Javaish is also Clojurish, but I still feel a
difference).



I agree. I asked for suggestions for the factory fn in #clojure, but got some pushback against introducing things in the namespace. I'm still open to suggestions, here are the issues:

The generated type name is now imported, so at the very least the factory fn can't have the same name as the class. Alternatives are create-Foo etc.

Some have asked for parameterized factories:

(record Foo ...) or (record ::Foo ...)

These cannot be made as fast as direct factories. Also, they may be used for key/value initialization:

(record ::Foo :field1 v1 :field2 v2 ...)

As soon as people want bodies for the factories, in order to do argument transformation/validation/defaulting, a generated factory is in the way.

We left it at: If you really want a factory you can always write one, let's see if people do.

Rich

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to