On 2010 Apr 1, at 12:56 PM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
I think you are reading this backwards. Nothing will be removed from the list, things won't become more limiting. The lack of guarantee is around the addition of new features.

:)

Clojure is remarkably stable. The ecosystem of libraries around it is, of course, another story. :-)

Yup, no dispute there.


I think I'll stick to using what works even if not officially sanctioned, with the belief that clojure will 'do the right thing' and not take away symbol characters without:
 a) very very good reason and
b) prominent notice of the new functionality of the off-limits-to- symbols characters in the release notes.

Clojure will not take away any of the documented symbol characters.

The question is: *when* will it be safe to add more?
I had hoped that the http://clojure.org/reader was just out of date.

I can't seem to find a "roadmap" link from the front page or the FAQ, I don't know what changes might yet be planned. I'm guessing, from the goals of Clojure, that there probably aren't many reader related changes in the works.

I'm going to use things that work even if they aren't documented as guaranteed, because I can't imagine special meanings being added without them being documented/announced; at that point, I can decide to change my code or not upgrade.


        -Doug

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.

Reply via email to