On Mar 29, 8:56 am, Steven Devijver <steven.devij...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I understand there are more clojure-ish ways > then to use Java interfaces, but I take from your answer that using > Java interface with gen-class won't introduce technical issues.
It's possible, but Clojure isn't designed to work that way. Put it another way: let's say I plan to make a Java program using nothing but static methods, and instead of using types I wanted to make everything an Object, and then cast it as needed. This is technically possible, but in your opinion, would it be a good idea? - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
