Hi, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:04:34PM +0000, Robert Lally wrote:
> I ask because I found that every time I wanted to change my code from > (.method1 object) to (.. object method1 method2) it would have been easier > if the code were (. object method1) moving to (.. object method1 method2) > and, after a while, I started consistently using the form you've indicated > is sub-optimal. I abandoned .. long ago. I only use ->. (-> object .method1 .method2 works-also-with-clojure-fns (.method3 with args)) Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
