On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I make no claims about the Rightness of this suggestion, but >> simply offer another example of a work-around: >> >> (dosync (alter r identity) (alter r f)) >> >> That is, a "dummy write" via alter is also sufficient to allow >> the transaction to succeed, just like 'ensure'. > > This is an interesting idea which can be automated (well, to be frank, an > implicit ensure could also be automated but it doesn't feel kosher) by > adding a doAlter to c.l.LockingTransaction:
Well, what you've got there seems much cleaner than a dummy write, and makes 'alter' do a lot less work than it did. I won't pretend to understand the STM well enough to know if it's all correct though. --Chouser http://joyofclojure.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
