Thanks. BTW, you may want to consider targeting ejml instead of colt if you are targeting dense matrix operations. ejml does quite a bit better performance-wise. Colt does support more matrix types though.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:00 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > On 8 Mar 2010, at 19:22, Jonathan Shore wrote: > >> For the sake of understanding, I'm not yet clear on how one *efficiently* >> binds multiple "pieces" of state together in clojure. How would one create >> a simple matrix for example where I want to bind dimension and a float-array >> into a tightly bound structure. I can see that a assoc / map could be used >> (but has undesireable overhead) or perhaps a closure with the array, >> dimensions, and a returning function for access? > > http://code.google.com/p/clj-multiarray/ > > This is work in progress, it's certainly not ready for production use. But it > does show how the problem can be attacked, using the new deftype mechanism in > the current development branch of Clojure. > > In Clojure 1.0 and 1.1, I don't see a way to package data together with fast > access times. I guess that's why deftype is being added to 1.2. > > Konrad. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
