I'm still undecided whether to shake this habit:

,----
| (defmacro unless [pred & body]
|   `(when-not ~pred ~...@body))
`----

Heh. I still think that "unless" is a better name than "when-not", but I've migrated pretty easily.

This is an interesting point, though -- does "unless" communicate something slightly different to* "when not", despite being functionally identical? And is the distinction important enough to justify a move towards a confusing Rubyesque undergrowth of equivalent syntactic sugar?

Probably not, although `unless` is really no different to `when`: they both eventually expand into `if` forms. I'm not entirely sure where the line should be drawn, or why I draw it where I do...

Incidentally, I initially didn't know about `when-not` -- I figured that `unless` had simply been omitted -- so I defined:

(defmacro unless [pred & body]
  `(when (not ~pred) ~...@body))

I was soon corrected :)

-R

* Read as "than" if you grew up with American English grammatical structures! Ah, language.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to