Hi, On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:07:33PM -0500, Alan Dipert wrote: > Hi Meikel, thank you as always for your help!
You are welcome. :) > This makes a lot of sense. Am I correct in understanding that at some > level there is a separation of var and fn namespace? Or is the need > for deref more just a consequence of the way objects respond with > their contents? No. There is no separation of var and fn namespace. Clojure is a Lisp-1 (for some suitable definition of Lisp-1). Clojure stores all global bindings in Vars. Be it a function, a number, a map, whatever. Now the need for deref comes from the fact, that ns-resolve returns the Var itself and not its contents. These are retrieved with the deref. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
