On Feb 14, 1:53 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it would be ideal that if you *don't* > specify clojure.lang.IPersistentMap as an interface, you still get an > implementation of assoc that works only with keys already in the type. ... > Thoughts?
Rich's stated reason against this is that he wants to be able, some day, to implement maps and map-like things with deftype. -SS -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
