Thanks Adrian et al.
I am going to remove recur from try catch special form. (BTW: doseq is
not the case since I need to modify freely the collection during
looping)
On the other hand I am curios whether "no recur inside the try-catch
special form" might be adopted as a "rule of thumb". It is interesting
since there are some cases when it works perfectly e.g.:
(def ll ['a 'b 'c 'd])
(loop [e (first ll) f (rest ll)]
(try
(cond
(= e nil)
nil
(= 0 0)
(do
(println e)
(recur (first f) (rest f))))
(catch Exception _ (println "ex"))))
In other words it is OK if there is nothing more inside the loop than
try-catch special form. But, adding a side effect methods to loop body
starts the problem.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
