Hi, Am 04.02.2010 um 20:00 schrieb Erik Price:
> What kind of naming convention is appropriate for a function that > operates on a sequence, and, as one of its return values, returns a > new head for (or in other words a subsequence within) that sequence? > For example, a function that consumes some portion of a stream. Or is > it not conventional for a stream-consuming function to work that way? There is no naming convention: filter, remove, take, take-nth, drop-while, ... are all examples of that. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
