On Feb 3, 7:18 pm, James Reeves <weavejes...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Feb 3, 8:44 pm, Vagif Verdi <vagif.ve...@gmail.com> wrote: >
> This again is something that's limited to Compojure, and not > necessarily indicative of a problem with the functional approach. I agree. As long as session implementation is robust and simple to use without corner cases it does not really matter for me how they are implemented internally. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
